OccurrenceRecordLsidVoc

This vocabulary has been superseded by
TaxonOccurrenceLsidVoc. The reasoning is outlined on the
TaxonOccurrenceLsidVoc page.
This is a summary of the LSID Vocabulary for
OccurrenceRecord?. Read
LsidVocs information on LSID Vocabularies in general.
Resources
Deployments
Further Information
OccurrenceRecords? are linked to surrounding objects as illustrated in this rough UML diagram.
Surely people identify specimens not occurrence records?
An expert working in a biological collection is superficially looking at specimens and putting names on them but they are actually generating hypotheses that the thing this specimen was taken from was an instance of a particular taxon that occurred in a particular place at a particular time.
- The physical specimen in question may have multiple organisms present on it and give rise to multiple occurrence records.
- The specimen may consist of a blood or tissue sample and is not therefore an instance of the organism.
- The determination process may be destructive.
- The specimen may be derived from the organism in the wild (an imprint in rock or a photograph).
- It may be an n'th generation culture of the original sample.
- It may be the entire organism.
- The occurrence of a taxon may only be hypothesized from evidence in two specimens. Fertile material may be gathered at one time of year and vegetative material at another.
- It may be indicative of the absence of an organism (e.g. the lack of a parasite) - though this might be contentious.
Usage for surveying
There are two possible approaches to using
OccurrenceRecord? may be used to communicate the results of a survey.
- The procedure points to the survey procedure. The hasVoucher points to the notebook or other object that the occurrence is original recorded in.
- The procedure points to a single survey instance.
Usage for specimens view.
The
OccurrenceRecord? can be embedded within or linked to from a Specimen record. So a request for a specimen can include its associated
OccurrenceRecord?.
Discussion
Visiting the first link under Resources above with a modern web browser will display the documentation for the vocabulary. Please read this first. If you then have any discussion points or questions please add them below.
- Identification: Roger says above: "Surely people identify specimens not occurrence records?". But field observations that result in no collection event still require identification and produce an OccurrenceRecord?. -- BobMorris - 27 May 2007
- hasVoucher: the observation community and others accept electronic vouchers, such as images, video and sounds. This doesn't seem to be accomodated in the UML. -- BobMorris - 27 May 2007
- Locality: the OWL and the XSD seem to support both geocoded and textual locality. However, if I read them correctly, the OWL and XSD for SpecimenLsidVoc seem to support only geocoding. IMO both should support either. But in any case, there is a data integrity issue caused by hasVoucher if an OccurrenceRecord? OR hasVoucher Specimen S and OR and S have inconsistent locality data. -- BobMorris - 27 May 2007
Linking Topics